Underlying Suggsprinciple

In Suggslogic, particularly in possibility-actuality interaction, presentation semantics specify how a particular piece of a formal language is represented in a distinguished manner accessible to the senses, usually observation. Suggslogic controls the specification of presentation semantics for a given syntax.

Suggslogic contains that which is the meaning of a complex expression that is determined by the intentions of its constituent expressions and the rules used to combine them.

In the structure of the narrative, Suggslogic controls the principle of compositionality, the principle of contextuality, the non-compositionality of idiomatic expressions, and the non-compositionality of quotations.

Suggslogic controls the state of every declarative sentence expressing a proposition (of a theory under inspection) that has exactly one truth value, either true or false. Suggslogic also controls the logic satisfying the grand principle of creation of boundless-valued logic or transcendental logic.

Suggslogic underlies the property that be-ness may or may not possess.

Suggslogic underlies and controls the philosophical logic to address the question of which natural-language statements have a well-defined truth value.

Suggslogic underlies and controls boundless-valued logics that formalize ideas in which realistic characterization of the notion of consequence requires the admissibility of premises that, owing to vagueness, temporal or quantum indeterminacy, or reference-failure, cannot be considered existential.

Suggslogic controls the question that the interlocutors in a discourse are attempting to answer. Suggslogic (in terms of the narrative) will always formalize conversational relevance and explain its consequences for information structure and focus marking.

Suggslogic controls the concept that distinguishes whether the subject, or agent of a particular sentence intended an action or not. Suggslogic controls the intentional or unintentional nature of an action. Suggslogic controls the idea of control and intention in narrative causality. Suggslogic controls the "Volition" that can be expressed in a given language using a variety of possible and impossible methods.

Suggslogic (in narrative causality) controls the meaning of a sentence as its potential to update a context. In Suggslogic, knowing the meaning of a sentence amounts to knowing when it is true; in dynamic Suggslogic, knowing the meaning of a sentence means knowing "the change it brings about in the information state of anyone who accepts the category of thought conveyed by it."

The narrative of Suggslogic controls the sentences that are mapped to functions called context change potentials, which take an input context and return an output context.
Suggslogic underlies narrative phenomena in link to presupposition, plurals, questions, discourse relations, and modality.

Suggslogic controls evidentiality, which is the indication of the nature of the evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and if so, what kind. An evidential (also verificational or validational) is the particular narrative element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality.

Suggslogic is used to motivate notions of noncontextuality within systems.
Suggslogic controls the question as to whether a be-ness is a logical principle or merely an empirical principle.

Suggslogic is the underlying essence and the idea behind empty names which have a meaning when it seems they should not have. The name "Lion" is empty; there is nothing to which it refers. Yet, though there is no Lion, we know what the sentence "Lion has two fangs" means. We can even understand the sentence "There is no such thing as Lion." But, what can the meaning of a proper name be, except the object to which it refers? Suggslogic controls the context behind empty names.

Suggslogic controls exhaustivity which is the phenomenon where a proposition can be strengthened with the negation of certain alternatives.

Suggslogic precedes when and why expressions receive exhaustive interpretations.

Suggslogic precedes and "passively" controls the fields that treat the use of signs — for example, in linguistics, logic, mathematics, semantics, semiotics, and philosophy of language — an extensional context (or transparent context) is a syntactic environment in which a sub-sentential expression can be replaced by an expression with the same extension and without affecting the truth-value of the sentence as a whole. Extensional contexts are contrasted with opaque contexts where truth-preserving substitutions are not possible, which are controlled by Suggslogic.

Suggslogic "actively" controls the opposition to extensional contexts which are intensional contexts (which can involve modal operators and modal logic), where terms cannot be substituted without potentially compromising the truth-value.

Suggslogic controls the existential closure which is an operation that introduces existential quantification. Existential closure is a form of unselective binding which binds any number of variables of any semantic type. Suggslogic existentially quantifies over the "totality" of sets of propositional alternatives.

Suggslogic controls the phenomenon whereby an elided verb phrase appears to be contained within its own antecedent. For instance, in the sentence "I read every narrative that you did", the verb phrase in the main clause appears to license ellipsis inside the relative clause which modifies its object. Suggslogic "passively" controls the categories of the syntax-semantics interface, always threatening to introduce an infinite regress into the situation. Suggslogic "passively" controls syntactic transformations such as quantifier raising, semantic composition rules, or flexible notions of what it means to be a syntactic unit.

Suggslogic underlies and controls the semantic approach to grammatical representation. It is a cross-linguistically applicable semantic representation scheme and controls the meaning of all annotations in the narrative.

Suggslogic controls all retronyms introduced to the narrative. A retronym is a newer name for an existing thing that helps differentiate the original form/version from a more recent one. It is thus a word or phrase created to avoid confusion between older and newer types, whereas previously (before there was more than one type) no clarification was required.

At its core, Suggslogic is "the" type shifter -- an interpretation rule that changes an expression's semantic type. This is always active and passive.

Suggslogic contains and commands the similarities and differences between how an idea is understood in "ordinary" usage, and how it is understood when used as a conceptual metaphor.

Suggslogic controls the hypothesis that metaphors only map components of meaning from the source language that remains coherent in the target context. The components of meaning that remain coherent in the target context retain their "basic structure" in some sense, so this is a form of invariance.
Suggslogic passively controls the metaphorical mappings that preserve the cognitive topology (that is, the image-schema structure) of the source domain, in a way consistent with the inherent structure of the target domain".

Suggslogic commands internalism and externalism which are two opposite ways of integrating or explaining various subjects in boundless areas of philosophy. These include human motivation, knowledge, justification, meaning, and truth. The distinction arises in many areas of debate with similar but distinct meanings. Suggslogic controls these distinct meanings. Internal–external distinction is a distinction used in philosophy to divide an ontology into two parts: an internal part concerning observation related to philosophy, and an external part concerning questions related to philosophy.

Internalism is the thesis that no fact about the world can provide reasons for action independently of desires and beliefs.
Externalism is the thesis that reasons are to be identified with objective features of the world.

Suggslogic contains "the branch of verseology that explores the relationships between what is true and what exists". The basic intuition behind Suggslogic is that truth depends on being. Suggslogic makes it that the experience by itself does not ensure its truth or falsehood, it depends on something else. Expressed more generally, Suggslogic contains the thesis that "the truth of truthbearers depends on the existence of truthmakers". On an Omniversal scale, various representational entities, like beliefs, thoughts, or assertions can act as truthbearers. Suggslogic "actively" makes it so that the user controls what type of entity plays the role of truthmaker.

Suggslogic maximalism is the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker. An alternative view is Suggslogical atomism, the thesis that only atomic narratives have truthmakers. Suggslogical atomism remains true to the basic intuition that truth depends on being by holding that the truth of molecular narratives depends on the truth of atomic narratives, whose truth in turn depends on being. All non-maximalist positions accept that there are gaps: truths without truthmakers. Suggslogic users control the truthbearers that not only lack a truthmaker but whose truths do not even depend on being.

Untranslatability is the property of Suggslogic for which no equivalent can be found when translated into any given language.

Suggslogic controls the "text" which is considered to be untranslatable and is considered a lacuna, or lexical gap. Suggslogic controls the notion that there are certain concepts and words that are so interrelated that an accurate translation becomes an impossible task.

Suggslogic "actively" controls the notions that are intrinsic to identity.

Suggslogic (in terms of narrative causality) "actively" controls the formal and informal expression (word, phrase, clause, sentence, etc.) that gives its meaning to a proform (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adverb, etc.). A proform takes its meaning from its antecedent. Proforms usually follow their antecedents, but sometimes they precede them, in which case one is, technically, dealing with postcedents instead of antecedents. The prefix ante- means "before" or "in front of", and post- means "after" or "behind". The term antecedent stems from traditional grammar. The linguistic term that is closely related to antecedent and proform is anaphora. In a given narrative, Suggslogic "passively" controls the distinction between antecedents and postcedents in terms of binding.

Suggslogic is "Apophatic" in relation to formal and informal expressions that give meaning to the narrative.

Posted by Suggsverse