Suggsxiential is the reasoning that operates on a higher plane of what can loosely be called existence than everything else in the setting and the world shapes itself to the user’s will because of this. MetaConceptualization and Actus Purus are impossible without the user’s direct will or suggslogic.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 1.

This inner principle allows one the authority to look down upon all of Creation as the handwriting of a Fiction, Nonfiction, Transfiction, Fanfiction, Metafiction, Patafiction, Interfiction, Personal Fiction, Impersonal Fiction, Incompatibilism Fiction, Impossible Fiction, Speculative Fiction, Xenofiction, Universal Genre, Universal Trope, Paratexts, Memetic Fiction, Transformation Fiction, and a priori and a posteriori Fiction which the user can effortlessly alter and amend according to their urge, pressing pause on the metanarrative itself in a style akin to a reader stopping to turn the pages of a book and writing down their preferred setting.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 2.

This inner principle allows one the authority of their “will” to be akin to possibility and actuality by design (retrocausality) “true” without any data or resistance to meaning. In other words, metaphysical meaning and pataphysical meaning cannot be applied to it and it automatically supersedes all meanings attached to Metaphysics and Pataphysics and denies them.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 3.

This inner principle allows one the authority over metaconceptual dynamism that directly targets one’s very existential and nonexistential principles. This means that any attempt to deny anything carried by this principle never existed to begin with. In terms of damage, anything dealt by this principle completely bypasses conventional abstract permanence.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 4.

This inner principle is the unquestionable, objective reality that supersedes itself, as well as facts or data to overwhelm creation. Fallacies are absorbed. Essence is denied. All unobserved possibilities, totality, and nothingness existing in relation to the totality of the Universe or transcendental boundless transhierarchical expanses are completely denied. Essentially, it is impossible to even attempt to deny the authority of this inner principle.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 5.

This inner principle is the Verseology of unswervingly denying the target’s point of view and continuation, completely (retrocausality) superseding any superiority over any logical, metalogical, paracausal, preconceptual, paraconceptual, and ontological meaning (philosophical)/meaning (linguistic)/meaning (nonlinguistic).