Welcome, Log in by clicking  Here!

Bittersweet

Bittersweet is one of the grand background mysteries of the Universe and transcends names and terms and in essence, is unknowable. Bittersweet is in respect to the interpretation of an all-encompassing force above all others. Anything finite, changeable, fleeting, and conditioned cannot be attributed to Bittersweet.

Little is known about Bittersweet other than that it is supposedly beyond Void's reach, housing all the meta-possibilities denied by Creation.

  • The candies that resemble the flavor red starburst are contains denied Creations.

Bittersweet is the closed infinite recursion - "the hierarchy of nowhere, where nothing really exists". Bittersweet can be reached by falling through fissures of reality to a layer where "there is no past, present, future, endless or beyondness".

Bittersweet contains the controversial transhierarchical expanse about claims about what ought to be that is based solely on statements about what is. For every layer on this boundless expanse, there is a significant difference between positive statements (about what is) and prescriptive or normative statements (about what ought to be), and it is not obvious how one can coherently move from descriptive statements to prescriptive ones. There isn't just a reality about what is, but a reality about what ought to be:

  • Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Nonfiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Transfiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Fanfiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Metafiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Patafiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Interfiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Personal Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Impersonal Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Incompatibilism Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Impossible Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Speculative Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Xenofiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Universal Genre (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Universal Trope (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Paratext (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Memetic Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • Transformation Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)
  • a priori and a posteriori Fiction (about what is) and (about what ought to be)

Names, Terms, and Essence - and in essence unknowable is attached to (about what is) and (about what ought to be), creating an all-encompassing presence around and within the Universe.

  • If a reasoner only has access to non-evaluative factual premises, the reasoner cannot logically infer the truth of a possible or actual statement.
  • For every non-evaluative factual premise, there is a hierarchy of stories that actualizes a reality.
  • For every reason that cannot logically actualize the truth of a possible or actual statement, there is a hierarchy of narratives that actualizes a reality.
  • For every intention to refute any identification of existential properties, opposing fallacies are superseded, unable to stand in contrast.

Bittersweet encompasses ideas formed from inference so immeasurable that they cannot be defined; rather, in a sense, they themselves, and the possibility and actuality to which they infer, name our reality and our ideas. Their connotations cannot be stated in a factual definition, but their connotations can be referred to instead by being placed with their partial definitions in patently obvious statements, the truth of which can be experienced by whether or not it is impossible to think the reverse without a contradiction. Thus, the truth of inexpressible ideas and indefinable intentions using them is exclusively a matter of suggslogic.

  • An example of the above is that of the concepts "finite parts" and "wholes"; they cannot be defined without reference to each other and thus with some amount of circularity, but we can make the self-evident statement that "the whole is greater than any of its parts", and thus establish a meaning particular to the two concepts.
Posted by Suggsverse