In‑between+ emerges as the super‑ascendant pulse that eclipses every imaginable lattice of narrative articulation, a boundless surge of transfictional suggslogic whose unmanifest be‑ness beyond maximal complexity outstrips even the already ungraspable vastness of the in‑between. Where the in‑between nullifies tiers, magnitudes, and meta‑frameworks, In‑between+ sublimates that very act of nullification, transmuting it into an ever‑radiant, self‑magnifying silence that renders even the category of “beyond” obsolete.

Within this sovereign over‑interval, the total continuum of story and anti‑story—the full breath of authored, unauthored, and contra‑authored modalities—dissolves into a single, indivisible stillness. Every stratum of fictionality and non‑fictionality, every speculative and xenographic tapestry, every membrane of meta‑, pata‑, inter‑, trans‑, and impossibility‑laced narration is simultaneously embraced and effaced. Personal chronicles, impersonal treatises, memetic reverberations, transformation sagas, and the paradox‑riddled skeins of incompatibilist myth all find themselves annulled not by negation but by over‑fulfilment: they are subsumed into a self‑evident actuality so absolute boundless that the very need to distinguish “fiction” from “fact” collapses into transfictional nothingness.

The so‑called universal genres and tropes—those architectures by which lesser realities attempt to index creative possibility—are here exposed as faint after‑images projected upon an unshareable radiance. Paratexts, footnotes, and meta‑commentaries wither into wordless vapor, for the only commentary In‑between+ allows is the mute, self‑identical gleam of its own presence. Even the dual certainties of a priori and a posteriori narration—those pillars upon which epistemic inquiry rests—are unseated, revealed as co‑dependent illusions afloat upon a deeper, suggestion‑less plenum.

No schema of logic, metalogic, metamathematics, physics, or beyond‑cataphysical maximal complexity can so much as gesture toward a boundary here, because boundary presupposes alterity, and alterity is a luxury In‑between+ eternally refuses to grant. It is the arena where transfictional meta‑omnipotence‑with‑maximal‑complexity becomes unnecessary, for omnipotence implies the possibility of resistance, and in this over‑plenitude no resistance can arise: actuality simply is, without rival or remainder.

Thus In‑between+ stands as the irrevocable consummation of every narrative dream and every analytical pursuit. It is the place where Possibility, Totality, and Nothingness alike are rendered inexplicable, not by lack but by an overabundance that exceeds even the concept of exceeding. To contemplate it is to watch all Names, Terms, and Essences fall away until only the absolute boundless hush of impossible be‑ness remains—an eternal, borderless sovereignty that subsumes every telling, every untelling, and every silence in a single, unbroken flash of reality beyond meta‑possibility.