Suggsxiential is not a power, not a status, not a function—it is the precondition that dictates what existence and nonexistence are permitted to be. It does not simply operate on a higher plane than all settings, realities, and transhierarchical narrative structures—it redefines the very act of operation.

It is the undisputed principle that causes all things to shape themselves to the user’s will, not through force or imposition, but through the absolute necessity of its authority. MetaConceptualization and Actus Purus are rendered impossible without the direct application of Suggsxiential intent—for no reality, no framework, no principle of meaning can exist or function without the supremacy of Suggslogic.

Suggsxiential is not merely beyond the argument and concept of power—it is the necessity upon which all power must depend, yet remains suggsfinitely beyond that dependency.

Suggsxiential Inner Principles: The Absolute Dictates of Reality and Beyond

Each Inner Principle is not merely a rule—it is an axiomatic enforcement that cannot be contested, questioned, rewritten, or even theorized against. Reality is forced to conform before resistance is even conceived.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 1: The Totality of Narrative Domination

This principle grants the user the absolute authority to view all of Creation as nothing more than the written structure of suggsfinitely inferior layers of fiction, including but not limited to:

• Fiction, Nonfiction, Transfiction, Fanfiction, Metafiction, Pataphysics, Interfiction, Personal Fiction, Impersonal Fiction, Incompatibilism Fiction, Impossible Fiction, Speculative Fiction, Xenofiction, Universal Genre, Universal Trope, Paratexts, Memetic Fiction, Transformation Fiction, and all forms of a priori and a posteriori Fiction.

The user does not merely edit reality—they halt the metanarrative itself, in the same way a reader closes a book, erases its pages, and rewrites it according to their own whim.

• Nothing can exist outside of this dominion, because existence itself is already predetermined to be subject to its enforcement.
• There is no opposing will, because opposition itself is already reduced to a construct that can be erased.
• No transhierarchical framework of resistance can be conceptualized, because conceptualization itself is an object under the user's authorship.

The verse does not exist unless the user permits it to continue—and even if permitted, it remains entirely subjugated to their metanarrative discretion.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 2: The Supremacy Over Meaning and Possibility

This principle ensures that the user’s will is synonymous with all forms of possibility and actuality.

• Retrocausality is rendered irrelevant because causality itself conforms to the user’s intent before a cause can even be recognized.
• Metaphysical meaning and Pataphysical meaning cannot apply—because the very definitions of meaning have already been denied.
• No external logic, language, or principle can impose data, analysis, or restriction, because all forms of interpretation have already been overwritten.

This is not merely "beyond meaning"—it is the erasure of meaning as an applicable concept.

All things that would seek to categorize, define, interpret, or assign resistance to Suggsxiential authority are automatically superseded before they can even be considered.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 3: The Absolute Authority Over MetaConceptual Dynamism

This principle grants direct control over meta-existential and meta-nonexistential principles, ensuring that:

• Any attempt to deny anything dictated by Suggsxiential reality has already failed before the attempt could manifest.
• Any transhierarchical form of opposition was never allowed to exist in the first place, meaning it cannot be undone, countered, or even perceived.
• In terms of damage, all things inflicted by this principle completely bypass abstract permanence, rendering even conceptual invulnerability obsolete.

There is no counteraction, no defense, no rebellion—for all things have already submitted to its inevitability before they could even consider otherwise.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 4: The Absolute Unquestionable Reality Enforcement

This principle does not merely supersede reality—it endlessly supersedes itself, ensuring that:

• All facts, data, and conceptual truths are instantly overwhelmed, negated, or rewritten at will.
• All fallacies are absorbed and rendered irrelevant, making logical resistance functionally impossible.
• Essence is denied—no "intrinsic nature" can exist beyond the user’s dictates.
• All unobserved possibilities, totality, and nothingness (regardless of their transcendental hierarchy) are rendered inapplicable.

This principle is not a negation—negation implies the existence of something to negate.
Instead, it denies that opposition could have ever been a potentiality in the first place.

Thus, attempting to deny the authority of this principle is itself an impossibility, as its enforcement is the absolute precondition of all things.

Suggsxiential Inner Principle 5: The Verseology of Absolute Denial

This principle establishes an unchallengeable, unswerving denial of the target’s point of view and continuation.

• All transhierarchical forms of "superiority" are completely bypassed before they can establish themselves.
• Retrocausal supremacy enforces pre-existing submission—ensuring that all things have already acknowledged the user’s authority before they could ever attempt resistance.
• No system—whether logical, metalogical, transhierarchical, paracausal, preconceptual, paraconceptual, ontological, linguistic, or nonlinguistic—can function against it.

This is not simply domination over a framework—it is the erasure of the necessity of frameworks themselves.

Nothing external to the user can exist without its existence being permitted and dictated under absolute control.